From Rural Wisconsin – What it meant for one United Wisconsin County Coordinator to “Carry a Box”

Sheila Danielson (County co-coordinator) shared this story with the Jackson County recall celebration last Thursday night in Black River Falls. Nearly one hundred volunteers, State Senator Kathleen Vinehout, and staff from Congressman Ron Kind’s office were in attendance to thank each other for their efforts in gathering 3,000 signatures to recall Scott Walker countywide. The goal  for Jackson County was about 1,700 signatures to recall Walker based on 25% of the vote in the Gubernatorial election. The volunteer effort collected  25% of the total eligible voters signatures in the county; a representation in Rural Wisconsin that this is a statewide effort, even in truly “purple” regions of Wisconsin. I was particularly moved to hear this, and other personal stories as to how Scott Walker’s policies have negatively affected neighbors and friends.

Please share this moving tribute to those who “carried a box”, gathered signatures, and sustain this grassroots movement:

“What It Meant for me to carry a Box 

Oh my, what it meant to carry a box?  You would think the words and feelings would come easy.  Right?  Happy?  Yes.  Excited?  Yes?   Proud?  Yes!  I was elated when I heard we had 1,000,000 + Signatures.  And yes, I was making history.  But still those words didn’t cover what I was feeling? 

Aah, then I realized what I felt.  Responsibility!  People trusted me with their future. Here I am carrying a box filled with signatures representing people’s dreams, their despair over how their lives have changed because of job loss and loss of job benefits, their loss of health insurance, their loss of long-time friendships, their loss of family relationships, loss of security, loss of their homes.

And their fear.  And on top of that, Wisconsin and the world were watching me!!  No wonder the box was so heavy!! 

And then came anger because we shouldn’t have to be having a recall.  Wisconsin’s constitution, Article 1, under the Declaration or Rights  tells us that we have certain inherent rights, and among those is/are? life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.   For me, the word that stands out in Article I is liberty, which means freedom from a government or political system in which the ruler exercises absolute power; liberty means the power or right of doing, thinking, speaking, according to choice, and these liberties are being taken away from us.  

Then I realized those signatures represent much more than that.  They represent hope, happiness, security, liberty, and most importantly – power.  We are no longer powerless!!   We are taking our power back!!!  1,000,000 + Wisconsinites are no longer powerless!!  We have started the process of taking our power back. 

Now my box wasn’t so heavy anymore!!!!”

 

Solidarity – and Forward!

 

 

The New Progressive Movement in Wisconsin – Where We Go From Here

A little over one week ago, volunteers from all over the state gathered in Madison and turned in over one million signatures to recall Governor Scott Walker. A little less than a year ago, that same Governor dropped the bomb known as the “Budget Repair Bill” on the people of Wisconsin, triggering a movement that can only be characterized as a true grassroots resurgence of Progressivism in Wisconsin. When mass protests and grassroots activism take place because of the actions of a power hungry governor or Party, people don’t think in terms of “isms” – they think in terms of what is right for the state and its people. For decades, prior to Scott Walker and the new Corporate “Robber Barons”, that is what Wisconsin government was all about. That is the government we, as the heart of the grassroots movement, must strive to attain once again.

At the beginning of the Progressive movement in Wisconsin a century ago, Robert LaFollette – “Fighting Bob” – was fighting the same corporate takeover of government we are facing today. The original “Robber Barons” were using state and national government to increase profit, pay lower taxes, seize resources, and consolidate their political staying power through buying legislators and elections. This caused him to abandon the Republican Party, and form a new party of the people – the Progressive Party. In 1911, LaFollette defined the “Wisconsin Idea” of government as ensuring “well-constructed legislation aimed at benefitting the greatest number of people.”  The idea that government could be clean, honest, and accountable to the people was revolutionary during that time, and he characterized the challenge in a 1912 speech, saying:

“Free men of every generation must combat the renewed efforts of organized force and greed to destroy liberty.”

For Democrats and Progressives, this was a call to action that we have since left in the past – until last year. Scott Walker was a wake-up call in Wisconsin for all of us to re-engage the political process, and “combat” the “forces” of “greed” seeking “to destroy liberty.” The first shot in that battle was the mass protests that took place from February through the summer. The right of protest has been questioned and quelled by the GOP powers throughout this process, with varying rules and laws being floated to subvert the First Amendment Right of citizens to” petition their government for redress of grievances.” This right was recognized by Martin Luther King Jr. in a speech to Montgomery Bus boycotters:

“There is never a time in our American Democracy that we must ever think we are wrong when we protest. We reserve that right. When labor all over this nation came to see that it would be trampled over by capitalistic power, there (is) nothing wrong with labor getting together and protesting for its rights.”

The protests in Wisconsin last year started a wave across the nation, of people waking up to the reality of corporate money and power stealing our Democratic birthright – just as they did one hundred years ago. Those protests were just the beginning.

The second shot to restoring liberty has been the gathering of reportedly 1.9 million signatures to recall not only Scott Walker, but the Lieutenant Governor and 4 Republican State Senators – an overwhelming amount of signatures that has shaken the political landscape in Wisconsin and the nation. Because of all your efforts, along with citizens across the state; the political debate is now focused around central issues of fairness, justice and equality in government and how people are governed. These issues are central to our grassroots movement, and being a progressive. Without needing labels, we, as Wisconsinites, know instinctively what is right, and how the government of the people should function. This inherent and instinctive knowledge must be exercised to bring about change in our political system – both parties. That is where this movement has a responsibility to take the struggle, for future generations.

It has been lost to history, as those who now control the politic rewrite our history books, that our founding fathers were keenly aware of the role of government in this experimental Democracy. Striving to create a Republic where “all men are created equal”, and all have the inherent right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” this government was to be different than the monarchies of Europe.

In a letter to Robert Morris in 1783, Benjamin Franklin wrote of economic justice and fairness:

“All the property that is necessary to a man, for the conservation and the propagation of the species, is his natural right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Public, who, by their laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other laws dispose of it, whenever the welfare of the public shall demand such disposition. He that does not like civil society on these terms, let him live among the savages – he can have no right to the benefits of society.”

It is striking how relevant that is today – as the wealth and income gap grows to greater extremes not seen since pre-Great Depression, multinational Corporations pay less in taxes as a percentage of net profit since the 1950’s, and these same corporations have a strangle hold on our Democratic and Judicial process. That is why what is happening now in Wisconsin is as critical as any political event in the history of our state. The people are again rising up – and through grassroots action, will take back what has been lost and restore our “Wisconsin Idea” of government.

The recall elections, and subsequent elections will require all of us to choose the candidates that will represent us. The success of our movement rests on the electoral process, and the leaders we choose. With that in mind, here are what I believe are the three keys to our future success.

First and foremost, we must do everything in our power to ensure citizens eligible to vote are registered and have the proper ID to exercise their Constitutional Right on Election Day. We must hold our elected officials and the Government Accountability Board “accountable” to facilitating this process, and hold “get out the vote” drives and educational programs to talk to our fellow citizens about the importance of voting. Until this “Mississippi-style” voter ID law is repealed, we have a lot of work to do – but the resources are there, and this is the keystone of Democracy – the vote.

Secondly, we must assure that votes are counted fairly, legally, and accurately. The current scanning and electronic voting machines have been suspect in recent elections, and many do not leave a paper trail to check against during an audit (as in Waukesha County during the State Supreme Court race). There is a movement that we must support in our local elections, and push statewide – and that is for hand counted, paper ballots. In most scenarios, this method actually saves the taxpayers money, is more accurate, and can easily be audited in case of a recount or error. It is also the only way to ensure that election fraud is not taking place systemically – as local and state officials have no way of controlling or auditing programs set by the manufacturer. A manufacturer that has close ties to Conservative Republican interests.

Finally, we must elect the candidates that will represent us, the people of Wisconsin – not corporate special interests or high-powered financial contributors looking to turn state resources into profit. With that in mind, here is the beginnings of a “People’s Platform” – while it is not perfect, it is a starting point which we can build on for the future: 

  1. The people have a right to organize unions for the purpose of negotiating for pay and benefits, and for the redress of grievances against an employer. We base this right on the United Nations establishment of the International Labor Organization in 1919 as part of the Treaty of Versailles, and which the US adopted in 1934. This treaty recognizes the right to organize as a “basic human right in a civilized society.” In his State of the Union Address just prior to the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln said, “It must be understood, Labor is prior to and independent to capital. Capital is only the fruit of Labor, and could NEVER have existed if Labor had not first existed. LABOR IS THE SUPERIOR OF CAPITAL, and deserves much the higher consideration.”
  2. Ensure the solvency and public accountability of Social Security and state pensions, so that citizens may retire after dedicating their lives to supporting our society.
  3. Commit to a not-for-profit, single payer health care system recognizing that to achieve “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” one must have full access to quality health care, regardless of socio-economic status.
  4. Commit to the highest quality available Public Education system supported by and accountable to the community for the good of our Democracy, and the welfare and success of future generations.
  5. Public Works/Public Housing – Commit to creating programs that will not only work with existing trade and technical colleges to train new workers, but create an infrastructure recovery plan that will put these people to work, for the benefit of the community and state at large – thus creating a new influx of middle class, not diminishing it.
  6. Lobby for and support a continued progressive tax structure to assure those who are able to pay do, in support of our better society (see Franklin, above); and those who are the working poor continue to have access to the earned income credit for their relief.
  7. Any corporation desiring to tap the human, environmental, or financial resources of the state for their private profit must have accountability to the taxpayers, be subject to public audit and disclosure, and share those profits with the people of the state – without whom they would not have achieved said profits.
  8. Clear and concise regulation of financial institutions, with full legislative fiscal accountability.
  9. Increased and enforced protection of civil liberties and environmental regulations under state and federal law.
  10. An end to all offensive wars not formally declared or authorized by Congress and an end to US Imperialism around the world, focusing on diplomatic relationships and building security at home. Any entry into war should be in defense of an imminent threat to the United States and its citizens.
  11. Citizens United must be repealed or a Constitutional amendment approved to take unlimited corporate money out of politics, corporations are not people, and money is not speech.
  12. Trade policies must be repealed and rewritten to PROTECT the American worker and middle class – not decimate it and give incentives to multinational corporations to move overseas for cheap labor, only to line their own pockets.

These issues are at the forefront of this movement, and it is time for all of us to carry the message forward. For too long, as Democrats and Progressives we have run away from these ideas – they are now critical to the future of Wisconsin and the nation.

A clean, honest government that works for the betterment of a majority of the people – not the 1%. These are the ideas and initiatives that must move us forward…or we are doomed to repeat the mistake of being disengaged, and allowing the Scott Walkers and Fitzgerald brothers of the world to give away this wonderful, progressive state we love. This grassroots movement is our hope for the future, and we will not fail if we stand together.

Top Ten Badger Democracy blogs of 2011…

To all Progressives fighting the good fight – a New Year wish for our state and nation, to forward the traditions of good government of and by the people. A progressive replacement for the corporatic scourge that has hijacked representative Democracy. As a reminder of what we are fighting, and fighting for – a reminiscence of the ten most read Badger Democracy blogs from 2011.

Thanks for reading, and thanks for taking part in Democracy.

1.Walker Cronyism Places State Patrol Troopers Under Fitzgerald in suspect situations

2. State Employee Fired after sending “Voter ID” email

3. Kaukauna School Board and Scott Walker have something in common…

4. Beyond the polls…moderate Wisconsin Republican voters are ditching Walker as radical right panics

5. The Big Five Lies in the Walker Budget

6. Top Ten Reasons to Recall Rebecca Kleefisch

7. Scott Walker’s Coronation is complete…Act 21

8. The ALEC-Koch pipeline to Wisconsin Legislators and the mining bill

9. Scott Walker has failed Wisconsin – the Labor Day edition

10. Walker emails expose knowledge of Foley and Lardner work on radical municipal governance legislation

Solidarity Forever – and see you for the recall election in 2012!

 

 

Walker’s GOP “Cronies” end four short years of GAB autonomy, shred constitutional checks and balances

The non-partisan Government Accountability Board (GAB) fell under the GOP hammer today, in Leah Vukmir’s powerful Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR) hearing. In a 6-4 partisan vote, the committee passed resolutions which will force the non-partisan and independent GAB to create “rules” regarding opinions they have rendered on voter ID and recall petitions over several months. These “rules” under the newly adopted Act 21 are subject to a virtual “veto” from Scott Walker, essentially eliminating any legislative check on the Governor’s authority. The move also puts the very autonomy of the GAB at risk – autonomy which kept watch over the partisan electoral process in Wisconsin; and was created in 2007 out of a bi-partisan effort to enforce fair election standards in Wisconsin.

The following motions were adopted by JCRAR :

1.  “JCRAR finds that the GAB motion to permit technical college IDs meets the definition of a rule and directs GAB to promulgate its action as an emergency rule within 30 days.”

2. Same as above but related to permitting the use of stickers on student IDs to put them in compliance with voter ID requirements.

3. Same as above but related to requiring that address information on recall petitions may only be filled out by the signer or circulator and may not be pre-populated using a database.

In all instances, GAB had already issued opinions which supported the use of college IDs, and the use of stickers to come into compliance with new Voter ID Laws; as well as opining on what was acceptable electronic format for recall petitions. GOP leadership vehemently disgreed with GAB opinion, and the adopted motions will force GAB into creating an Administrative Rule, which, under new Act 21, can be overturned by the Governor. This amounts to pushing the GAB into creating a rule which can be used in the partisan politics of the recall, as opposed to being a neutral regulator.

In a statement to the media, Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Madison) expressed his outrage at the Committee’s actions :

“Today is the day Scott Walker’s political cronies walked away from a bipartisan deal to create the independent GAB that I am proud to say I was a part of creating,”

“Republicans are trying to make it harder for students to vote and they should be ashamed of themselves,” said Pocan, who negotiated with Republicans in 2007 to take partisanship out of our election and ethics agencies. “Today, Republicans sent a strong signal that Scott Walker wants the fairest election he can rig.”

The G.A.B. is made up of six former judges, nominated by a panel of four Wisconsin Appeals Court judges, appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. The six board members serve staggered six-year terms; one member’s term expires each year.  Both the Board and its staff must be non-partisan.

The GAB was created by a bi-partisan act of the Legislature, and is funded independently of the Legislature to maintain its autonomy. The Board currently consists of six former Circuit Court Justices from around the state:

Judge Thomas Barland
tbarland's picture
Chair Eau Claire Eau Claire County Circuit Court, 1967-2000 May 1, 2015
Judge Gerald C. Nichol
gnichol's picture
Vice Chair Madison Dane County Circuit Court, 1988-2004 May 1, 2012
Judge Michael Brennan
mbrennan's picture
Member Marshfield Clark County Circuit Court, 1971-2001 May 1, 2014
Judge Thomas Cane
tcane's picture
Member Wausau Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 1981-2007Outagamie County Circuit Court, 1972-1981 May 1, 2013
Judge David G. Deininger
ddeininger's picture
Member Monroe Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 1996-2007Green County Circuit Court, 1994-1996 May 1, 2016
Judge Timothy Vocke
tvocke's picture
Member Rhinelander Vilas County Circuit Court, 1979-1983
Reserve Judge, 1983-1992 and 1994-present
May 1, 2017

In a commentary titled “The Persistence of Partisan Election Administration,” Ohio State University law professor Daniel P. Tokaji states: “The best American model is Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board, which consists of retired judges selected in a way that is designed to promote impartiality.”

Scott Walker and the GOP have discarded the national role model the GAB was; as they have for Collective Bargaining, Public Education, Badgercare, and Wisconsin’s Progressive traditions.

The recall of Scott Walker must succeed – as a message that NO Governor, or single individual, is above the Constitution. Nor is one person or party entitled to such broad and sweeping power so as to effect single party rule in Wisconsin, suppress the true will of the people, and trample the rights of the minority.

Put Wisconsin First – Forward with the recall!

Recall petition triggered by Walker donor from Muskego, records show

David Brandt of Muskego filed the petition to launch a recall of Scott Walker today, earlier than grassroots and Democrats has intended.

Campaign finance records show that David and Bettie Brandt of Muskego were first and one time donors to Scott Walker’s 2010 campaign. David giving $50, and his wife Bettie donating $100. these are the only records of campaign contributions that could be found for either individual.

This would confirm suspicions the recall has been triggered to allow Walker to begin raising unlimited campaign funds, as is the case for an incumbent potentially facing recall.

Phone calls to the Brandt residence have so far not been answered.

 

Early August Unemployment Numbers show slight increase in Wisconsin; Decrease in National

Preliminary numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show Wisconsin’s Unemployment Rate still outpacing the National Rate; rising from 7.8% to 7.9% in preliminary data reporting. According to the report, there were over 800 newly unemployed workers, while the numbers of employed dropped by over 200o workers.

The National Rate remained steady, while new applications for unemployment declined. Depending on the revised final numbers, Wisconsin would continue to outpace the National Unemployment rate increase.

Scott Walker has called a “Special Session” to address job creation, although a majority of bills rather address deregulation, tax breaks for Corporations, and State-supported speculation. Bills on the schedule are listed at the previous link, and can be referenced at mygov365 or the www.legis.wisconsin.gov.

Kloppenburg statement confirms necessity of outside investigation, questions GAB “investigation”

This morning, I sent the following email to Michael Haas at the Government Accountability Board, asking still unanswered questions about the conduct and implementation of the April 5 election in Waukesha County:

Michael,
 
We spoke after the April 5 election, and I forwarded you information re the 2006 election in Waukesha County. I also posted a blog on April 14 with that information, as well as a comparison of Waukesha vs. other county results from other years https://bdgrdemocracy.wordpress.com/2011/04/14/waukesha-county-how-many-elections-should-be-recounted/
 
After hearing and reading Joanne Kloppenburg’s statement yesterday, I wanted to ask you some follow-up questions that are most likely stirring in many people’s minds, and I would ask you to reply on record. You can reply to this email address and include any future press releases to the same address.
 
1. In the GAB statement, it was stated that all ballots have been secure since election night. In regard to that statement – Did Ms. Nickolaus have access to those sealed bags in the 30+ hours between the end of the election and her announcement of the “discovered” missing votes? Since touch screens were brought in the night of the election and photocopied ballots used, was there opportunity on election night to manipulate machines and ballots cast at any of those precincts (is that a possibility your office even investigated)?
 
2. On election night, Waukesha county displayed a running total of total votes cast. That information is no longer available on the Waukesha County Clerk website. Here is the “Official” count document posted, which I will assume you have seen http://www.waukeshacounty.gov/uploadedFiles/Media/PDF/Elected_Officials/County_Clerk/Election_Results/20110215_unofficial_results_summary.pdf
Regarding this document and report – Every other county posts a total votes cast for the election, why not Waukesha? An honest observation of this document when compared to other counties’ official documents raise question as to its validity – The document was generated on April 7, 4:21 pm, just before (or during) Ms. Nickolaus’ press conference; it was modified (right-click, doc properties) two hours later, and is “page 1 of 2” – where or what is page 2 (or is this a blank page from a poorly created pdf)? Why is there no vote total listed for this election?
 
3. Your office stated its examination of the canvass totals were consistent with reported results. If 14,000 votes were not reported from the City of Brookfield in the election – what was the effect of those votes on the other races after the “discovery” of those votes? There were other races in Brookfield on that ballot – there has been no accounting of any other affected races. How is that possible?
 
4. Did your investigation include any examination of Ms. Nickolaus’ computer – email/communications regarding the election, data entry/transfers, key stroke, deleted/recovered files, etc.? Did it even occur to your office to examine this information?
 
Finally, I am not questioning your ability in overseeing a non-partisan office, nor am I doubting that you strive to assure fair elections. What I do question is the capacity of the people conducting the inquiry to act as quickly and aggressively as necessary to insure preservation of critical evidence. It has been 16 days since the election (2 of which saw no disclosure of known information). In that time, there has been time for the evidence trail to not only run cold, but to be severely altered. If you refute the fact that the pattern of behavior in Waukesha county warrants a thorough investigation, I would like to know why. In the meantime – I believe the call from Tammy Baldwin for Federal Investigation and now Ms. Kloppenburg for an independent investigation is fully warranted. I also believe she is correct that the investigators in your office were compromised by their close contact with Ms. Nickolaus. I would ask under state open records to have access to the same communications between your office and Ms. Nickolaus that Joanne Kloppenburg received.
 
As always, thank you for your time and effort during what is an unprecedented time.
 
Scott Wittkopf
bdgrdemocracy

Joanne Kloppenburg did what was required of her in this process, and the GAB must do what is required of them. At this time, the only avenue to recover confidence in elections for all parties involved is not only a recount, but a complete and forensic investigation – executed by someone capable of such an investigation. Many people (myself included) called for that type of investigation very early on – at this time, the evidence is already compromised. The questions have been asked and unanswered – the methodology needs to be as aggressive as necessary to answer them. Recount, and independent investigation will restore faith in fair elections – “nothing to see here, move along” attitude will only deepen the chasm of cynicism.